In 1951,George purchased a piece of property in a cottage resort area.The property was subject to a restrictive covenant running with the land until August 1,2050,that the property shall never be sold,assigned,transferred,or leased to any person born in the State of Israel.In January 2004,George entered into an agreement of purchase and sale with another individual.The purchaser through his solicitor submitted the following requisition on title: "in view of the fact that the purchaser herein was born in the State of Israel,I require a release from the restrictions imposed on the land,and the restrictive covenant struck out,void and of no effect." George was only too happy to provide this release,however,an adjoining landowner wished to enforce the restrictive covenant.Together,George and his purchaser made an application to the courts to have the restrictive covenants struck down as against public policy.Discuss the issues raised in this case,from a perspective of the 1950s and the perspective of the 21st century,and render a reasoned decision.Regardless of your answer,if the covenant was upheld,suggest an alternative way this sale may be affected without violating the covenant.
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q32: Where the roof of one person's home
Q40: A residential water heater is a fixture
Q41: Death of one of two joint tenants
Q42: There is no true ownership of land
Q44: Describe the types of, and rights attached
Q47: Death of one of two tenants-in-common vests
Q48: Mary was left her grandfather's interest in
Q49: Describe the process by which possessory interests
Q51: Discuss the rights and duties associated with
Q52: Describe how a condominium development is operated,
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents