An alarm call benefits multiple individuals, both related and unrelated (r 0) . Can this behavior still evolve according to Hamilton's rule? (There are 1, 2, . . . , A individuals that are related to the donor by r1, r2,…, rA and receive benefits b1, b2,…, bA)
A) No; unrelated individuals will automatically set the benefits to 0, as Hamilton's rule for
Multiple individuals is 
B) No; this case no longer addresses inclusive fitness, and Hamilton's rule does not apply.
C) Yes, if there are more related individuals benefiting than unrelated individuals, as Hamilton's rule for multiple individuals is
D) Yes, as long as the benefits to related individuals satisfy
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q6: In order for a game to be
Q7: Under what circumstance is there a mixed
Q8: Konrad Lorenz argued that "for the good
Q9: The model below predicts that the begging
Q10: Which of the following statements illustrates the
Q12: Based on the model for conventional signals
Q13: Which of the following represents a Nash
Q14: Is haplodiploidy a necessary condition for the
Q15: Which of the following equations illustrates the
Q16: Consider the modified payoff structure for the
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents