A researcher computes a one-sample z test in two studies.Both studies used the same alpha level,placed the rejection region in both tails,and measured the same sample mean.The researcher selects a sample of 30 participants in Study 1 and decides to retain the null hypothesis.She selects a sample of 60 participants in Study 2 and decides to reject the null hypothesis.Which of the following is the best explanation for why the decision was different in Study 1 and Study 2?
A) The different decisions in Study 1 and Study 2 are not possible because all values were the same.
B) The different decisions in Study 1 and Study 2 are not possible because the researcher tested the same hypothesis.
C) The different decisions in Study 1 and Study 2 are due to an error the researcher made in the first hypothesis test.
D) The different decisions in Study 1 and Study 2 are possible because the second test was associated with greater power to detect an effect.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q41: A null finding is a decision to
Q42: A researcher tests a hypothesis to prove
Q43: Researchers directly control for the probability of
Q44: Rejecting a true null hypothesis is a
Q45: The null hypothesis and alternative hypotheses are
Q47: A researcher reports that the standard
Q48: Increasing sample size will
A) increase the alpha
Q49: Is a one-sample z test reported differently
Q50: A researcher conducts two studies.Each study was
Q51: The probability of correctly rejecting a false
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents