Marco Manufacturing contracted to sell Kurtz Industries 3,000 iron clasps.The contract specified: F.O.B.Kurtz Industries.Upon arrival and inspection,the goods were rejected by Kurtz Industries because they did not conform to the contract specifications.In transit back to Marco Manufacturing,the common carrier's truck overturned and completely destroyed the clasps.Which statement is correct?
A) Marco may sue Kurtz for the contract price,as risk of loss transferred to Kurtz at the F.O.B.point.
B) Kurtz will not be liable for the purchase price.The risk of loss had not yet transferred since the goods were nonconforming.
C) The loss will be split between the parties on a 50/50 basis.
D) The loss will be assigned to the party who can best bear the loss.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q3: You leave your watch with Bryte Jewelers
Q4: The UCC looks solely upon "title" to
Q5: A tag attached to a tree in
Q6: Generally,a contract may include language that limits
Q7: Mark,a power tool salesman,promises Jill,a customer,that the
Q9: Both the buyer and seller may have
Q10: Ruppart Manufacturing has a contract for the
Q11: In a shipment contract,the risk passes to
Q12: The buyer of a product is located
Q13: The shipping terms, FOB place of destination,indicate that
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents