Sarah,an employee of Amex Corporation,committed a serious criminal act in an attempt to obtain a large sales order for her employer.A court found her guilty of the felony and also found the corporation guilty of criminal conduct.The company was fined $1 million.The court
A) erred in fining the company because finding both Sarah and the corporation guilty violates the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Constitution.
B) acted properly if this were a federal proceeding;however,it did not act properly if this were a state proceeding.
C) acted properly in finding Sarah guilty;however,it erred in finding the corporation guilty because of the exclusionary rule.
D) acted properly in this case.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q34: Which of the following makes it illegal
Q35: Which of the following is NOT a
Q36: Approximately how much merchandise is stolen from
Q37: Racketeering mainly involves what type of criminal
Q38: Diane,a police officer,stops Tim's car for a
Q40: Connor sells a baseball on eBay that
Q41: What is the exclusionary rule and what
Q42: Compare and contrast money laundering and embezzlement.Give
Q43: Mary was suspicious of her neighbor,whom she
Q44: List and discuss the protections afforded criminal
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents