Which of Kant's basic human rights is violated when a supervisor requires an employee to do something that is unsafe or environmentally damaging, in spite of the employee clearly objecting to the order?
A) right of freedom of speech
B) right of equal opportunity employment
C) right to due process
D) right of freedom of conscience
E) right of privacy

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The right of freedom of conscience is violated when a supervisor requires an employee to do something that goes against their own beliefs, values, or ethical principles. In the given scenario, the employee is objecting to the order on the basis that it is unsafe or environmentally damaging, which suggests that the order conflicts with the employee's conscience. Kant believed that everyone has a duty to act in accordance with their own conscience, and that individuals should be free to choose what is morally right for them without coercion. Therefore, violating an employee's freedom of conscience is a violation of their basic human rights according to Kantian ethics.

Which of Kant's Basic Human Rights Is Violated When a Supervisor