Which statement best characterizes the findings by Groscup et al. 2002) about the impact of Daubert on the admissibility of expert evidence?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

DGroscup et al. (2002) found that the Daubert standard did not significantly change the overall admissibility rates of expert testimony, indicating that it did not drastically alter the landscape of what was considered admissible evidence. Additionally, they noted a shift in focus towards the scientific merit and methodology of the evidence rather than solely on the qualifications of the experts presenting it. This suggests a nuanced approach to evaluating evidence, emphasizing the importance of reliable scientific methods.

Which Statement Best Characterizes the Findings by Groscup Et Al