Which of the following was a finding of the court in Shiftan v.Morgan Joseph Holdings Inc.,the case in the text involving stock appraisal rights following a merger?
A) That standard rules of contract interpretation do not apply to the interpretation of certificates of incorporation.
B) That the rule of contra proferentem, meaning that contracts are construed in accordance with standard criteria for contract interpretation, is applied when interpreting certificates of incorporation.
C) That parol evidence, while often available, is inadmissible when interpreting certificates of incorporation.
D) That an appraisal proceeding takes into account and considers any relevant element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of a merger or consolidation.
E) That in valuing the stock at issue, the fact that the stock would have been entitled to a mandatory redemption a few months after the merger was irrelevant.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q17: If a merger increases the number of
Q18: Which of the following was the result
Q19: In a consolidation,shareholders of the new corporation
Q20: Aggressors often try to win the favor
Q21: In a hostile takeover situation,what does the
Q22: What key piece of information does an
Q23: In which of the following does an
Q24: Which of the following was the result
Q25: Which of the following occurs when an
Q40: Which of the following is false regarding
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents