Susan purchased a refrigerator from ABC Appliance store for $800.She takes the refrigerator home and discovers that it is defective.She calls ABC Appliance store and tells them that she would like to return the refrigerator.ABC Appliance store tells her that they have assigned the promissory note she provided the store in order to purchase the refrigerator to a finance company and that the finance company,as a holder in due course,is not subject to defenses.Which of the following is true regarding the rights of parties?
A) The finance company is subject to the defenses of Susan because of the Federal Trade Commission rule created to protect consumers.
B) ABC Appliance store is correct in that Susan cannot assert her defenses against the finance company.
C) Susan can assert her defenses against the finance company only if she can prove that the finance company had knowledge that ABC Appliance store sold defective equipment from time to time.
D) Susan can assert her defenses against the finance company only because she gave notice of the problem within 5 days of the sale.
E) Susan can assert her defenses against the finance company only if she agrees to arbitrate the dispute.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q23: Which of the following is not an
Q41: Which of the following is true regarding
Q41: Which of the following is true regarding
Q42: Which of the following is true regarding
Q43: What type of endorsement did Susan make
Q44: Which of the following is true regarding
Q46: Which of the following is the result
Q47: Which of the following is true regarding
Q49: Which of the following does the UCC
Q52: Which of the following does not prevent
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents