Which of the following is true regarding Roland's claim that Selina had no right to sell the furniture he initially purchased?
A) Roland is correct. Selina had no right to sell the furniture, but she retained the right to sue him for any deficiency.
B) Roland is correct but only because of the special UCC exception for consumer goods.
C) Roland is incorrect. Selina had a right to resell the furniture.
D) Roland is incorrect but only if Selina can prove that she had no reason to believe that he was a credit risk prior to signing the contract of sale.
E) Roland is correct because of federal consumer protection laws.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Sellers or lessors are allowed to sell the goods to another buyer or dispose of the goods when the buyer is in breach and the goods have not yet been delivered.

Which of the Following Is True Regarding Roland's Claim That