Which of the following was the result on appeal in Donovan v. RRL Corporation, the case in the text in which the plaintiff attempted to enforce a price for an automobile contained in an ad, and the defendant car dealership claimed that a mistake was involved?
A) The court ruled in favor of the dealership because ads can never constitute offers.
B) The court ruled in favor of the dealership because an intentional misrepresentation is needed before an ad can be considered an offer, and there was no proof of an intentional misrepresentation on the part of the dealership.
C) The court ruled in favor of the dealership on a combination of mistake and unconscionability.
D) The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff because the ad constituted an enforceable offer.
E) The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff on the basis of unilateral mistake and unconscionability.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The court ruled in favor of the dealership on a combination of mistake and unconscionability, recognizing that the ad, while potentially misleading, did not constitute an enforceable offer due to the mistake involved and the unconscionable outcome of enforcing the ad's price.

Which of the Following Was the Result on Appeal in Donovan