Which of the following is true regarding the efforts of the seller of the employment law pamphlets to remedy the problem with the incorrect pamphlets?
A) The seller could not exercise the right to cure once the contract time for performance had ended because the seller did not have reasonable grounds to believe that the nonconforming tender of environmental pamphlets would be acceptable to Penny.
B) The seller could likely exercise the right to cure once the contract time for performance had ended because the seller would have had reasonable grounds to believe that Penny would not have objected to the tender of the correct item at the time it was tendered.
C) The seller correctly acted to remedy the problem because he had up to 10 days under the UCC to fix any problem.
D) The seller correctly acted to remedy the problem because he had up to 20 days under the UCC to fix any problem.
E) The seller could not act to remedy the problem because he did not have assurance from Penny in writing that she would allow additional time in which to cure.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Sellers and lessors can repair, adjust, or replace defective or nonconforming goods as long as they give prompt notice of the intent to cure and go ahead and cure within the contract time for performance. Under UCC 2-508(2) and 2A-513(2), the seller or lessor can still exercise the right to cure once the contract time for performance has passed as long as the seller or lessor has reasonable grounds to believe that the nonconforming tender would be acceptable to the buyer or lessee. Here, the seller did not cure within the contract time for performance and had no right to cure after the contract time for performance due to the lack of reasonable grounds to believe that the nonconforming tender would be acceptable.

Which of the Following Is True Regarding the Efforts of the Seller