Which of the following was the result on appeal in Forest Commodity Corp.("FCC")v.Lone Star Industries Inc.,the case in the text in which the Forest Commodity Corp.denied that it violated a contractual nonassignability clause and claimed that it was entitled to recover on a breach of contract claim because the defendant did not fully perform?
A) The court ruled that FCC did not violate a nonassignability clause and that it was entitled to recover.
B) The court ruled that even though FCC violated the nonassignability clause, the nonassignability clause was against public policy; and FCC was allowed to recover.
C) The court ruled that even though FCC violated the nonassignability clause, the other party also violated a nonassignability clause resulting in FCC being able to recover its full claim.
D) The court ruled that FCC violated a nonassignability clause and was therefore unable to recover on its claim.
E) The court ruled that FCC violated a nonassignability clause but that because the other party also violated a nonassignability clause, FCC's recovery would be reduced by 50%, not completely barred.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The appellate court found that FCC was unable to recover because it had assigned the CAL thru-put agreement to WEC and that the defendant was entitled to summary judgment.

Which of the Following Was the Result on Appeal in Forest