Which of the following was true prior to the landmark 1916 case of MacPherson v.Buick Motor Company?
A) Negligence was rarely used as a theory of recovery for an injury caused by a defective product because of the difficulty of establishing the element of duty.
B) Negligence was rarely used as a theory of recovery for an injury caused by a defective product because of the difficulty of establishing causation.
C) Negligence was often used as a theory of recovery because of the ease in establishing privity of contract.
D) Causes of actions against manufacturers of products were barred federal law.
E) Causes of actions against manufacturers of products were barred by an amendment to the U.S. Constitution that has since been repealed.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q8: The state-of-the-art defense is not available in
Q14: Under the market share theory,a plaintiff may
Q15: Japanese law fails to recognize fault of
Q16: Which of the following must a plaintiff
Q20: When all products of a particular design
Q21: What was the ruling of the court
Q22: Section 402A of the Restatement (Second)of Torts
Q23: Under a strict product liability theory,who may
Q24: Which of the following may be sued
Q40: Following the case of MacPherson v. Buick
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents