Which of the following was the result in Family Winemakers of California v.Jenkins,the case brought by winemakers from California challenging a Massachusetts law distinguishing between how large and small winemakers could distribute their wines in Massachusetts?
A) That the law impermissibly discriminated against out-of-state winemakers in violation of the Commerce Clause.
B) That the law permissibly discriminated against out-of-state winemakers and did not violate the commerce clause.
C) That the law impermissibly discriminated against out-of-state winemakers in violation of the Twenty-first Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
D) That the law impermissibly discriminated against out-of-state winemakers in violation of the Webb-Kenyon Acts.
E) That the law did not discriminate against out-of-state winemakers and that, therefore, no violation occurred.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

We court held that the law violated the Commerce Clause "because the effect of its particular gallonage cap is to change the competitive balance between in-state and out-of-state wineries in a way that benefits Massachusetts's wineries and significantly burdens out-of-state competitors."

Which of the Following Was the Result in Family Winemakers