Smith visited the showroom of the Appliance Company and orally ordered a $300 refrigerator.The Company verbally accepted the order,and later (the next day) sent Smith a duplicate purchase order for the appliance along with a request that he sign and return one copy.Smith did not sign the order,and when the appliance was delivered,refused to take delivery.ABC sued Smith for breach of contract.
A) Smith could raise the Sale of Goods Act as a defence.
B) The purchase order sent by ABC to Smith would defeat Smith's defence based upon the Sale of Goods Act.
C) If Smith accepted delivery of the refrigerator and a week later refused to pay,ABC Company would not require a signed purchase order to enforce the contract.
D) In its suit against Smith the only remedy available to the ABC Company would be specific performance of the contract.
E) a and c.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q70: Consumer protection in respect of credit aims
Q71: In Canada,a contract for the sale of
Q72: Consumer protection laws have taken the following
Q73: Common law remedies available to consumers
A)arise only
Q74: Six months ago,Henri's consumer debt of $3,000
Q76: PlastiCo.contracted to buy 10,000 gallons of a
Q77: PlastiCo.contracted to buy 10,000 gallons of a
Q78: Farmer Brown bought a truckload of processed
Q79: Six months ago,Henri's consumer debt of $3,000
Q80: Deceptive labelling is prohibited under
A)the Food and
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents