Johnson Ltd.enters into a contract to supply glass bottles to Brine Co.for its line of baby dill pickles.Since it is a new relationship,both parties want the option to end the contract without problems,so they include a clause that allows either company to terminate the contract on 30 days' written notice.Johnson finds that Brine Co.is too slow in paying its bills and too quick to question quality.On March 1,Johnson Ltd.gives Brine Co.notice in writing that the contract will end on March 31.Brine Co.insists that the 30 days' notice clause means 30 working days,not 30 calendar days,and thus Johnson must supply Brine Co.until April 1.Johnson refuses.Brine Co.loses two weeks of production when its supply of bottles runs out and sues Johnson for breach of contract.
-Based on the above scenario,which is the most correct?
A) This is a mistake of law,specifically the law of contract.
B) This is a mistake of fact.
C) This is an example of a mistake of utmost good faith.
D) This is a case of innocent misrepresentation.
E) This is a mistake about the existence of the subject-matter of the contract.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q86: A student from another class says that
Q87: Box Co.assigns a conditional contract with Yee
Q88: Acme Finance Company approaches merchants and gives
Q89: Cal has just co-signed a car loan
Q90: In the presence of several witnesses,Liz verbally
Q92: Box Co.assigns a conditional contract with Yee
Q93: The arol evidence rule:
A)widens the scope to
Q94: Brenda discovered that her younger sister,Allison,desperate to
Q95: Carl agrees to buy a refrigerator from
Q96: Mary verbally agrees to purchase Martha's cottage
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents