Terry carried on a relatively successful business as a manufacturer of a cleaning product. After a few years of slow but steady growth, his accountant suggested that he expand the business by incorporating. This would allow the sale of shares to acquire the capital needed for expansion into a new plant with new equipment. The company was eventually incorporated but instead of selling shares, Terry decided to arrange a $200 000 loan from the bank and therefore, asked his accountant to prepare financial statements for the bank.
During preparation, the accountant failed to notice that the existing land and plant building were not acquired by the corporation, but retained by Terry and leased to the company on an annual basis. The accountant had included the land and building (value: $250 000) as an asset of the corporation on the financial statements without verifying this information with Terry to determine if the property had been transferred. When the error was later discovered during negotiations with the bank, the bank insisted that Terry guarantee the loan as a principal debtor, and use the land/building as additional security for the loan.
A few weeks later, Terry decided that it would be necessary to acquire additional capital to complete the company expansion. He contacted a private investor, Kelly, intending to sell her a block of shares in the corporation. Kelly inquired as to the financial status of the corporation and Terry informed her that the corporation had borrowed $200 000 from the bank for the purpose of expanding the business. He also suggested that Kelly contact either his accountant or the bank for information on the corporation's assets and financial position. Kelly contacted the bank, requesting copies of the financial statements the accountant had prepared. A bank employee, who was unaware that the statements were erroneous, gave them to Kelly without comment.
Based on the strength of the financial statements, Kelly invested $50 000 in shares of the corporation. Some months later, she discovered that the corporation did not own the land or buildings, and that the financial statements were in error.
Advise Kelly of her legal position, and her rights (if any) against Terry, the accountant, and the bank.
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q21: How would the duty of care be
Q22: What is the "threefold test" and how
Q23: A fiduciary duty of care may also
Q24: The liability of an engineer is limited
Q25: The full and understandable explanation of the
Q27: The failure of architects to maintain their
Q29: Insurance agents, even though they are agents
Q31: Professional negligence extends beyond carelessness in carrying
Q33: The Civil Code of Quebec establishes a
Q34: Normally, a professional is only responsible in
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents