In a recent case,Revlon sued United Overseas Limited (UOL)in the U.S.District Court for the Southern District of New York for breach of contract.UOL countered by asking the court to dismiss the claim since they are not operating in that area.Revlon cited the presence of a UOL sign above the entrance to the offices of a New York company in which UOL had a 50-percent ownership.The court dismissed UOL's claim.This is an issue related with:

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The issue at hand is related to jurisdiction, as Revlon is claiming that UOL breached a contract and is therefore invoking the jurisdiction of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. UOL is attempting to have the claim dismissed on the grounds that they are not operating in that area, which is a question of jurisdiction.

In a Recent Case,Revlon Sued United Overseas Limited (UOL)in the U.S.District