The state law of Michigan issues a tax on commerce carried on with states outside Michigan. The Congress enacted legislation that did not involve any taxes on interstate commerce to chiefly promote national uniformity. This conflict between the federal law and the state law resulted in the state law to be treated as unconstitutional. Which of the following statements is true of this case?
A) The federal law is said to be expressly preempted.
B) The state law of Michigan is said to be expressly preempted.
C) The federal law has been impliedly preempted.
D) The state of Michigan has exclusive power on interstate commerce where there is a need for national uniformity.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q7: The U.S. Constitution, according to the Fifth
Q8: In the U.S. Constitution, the fundamental rights
Q9: The federal government has the exclusive right
Q10: The Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993
Q11: According to the Religious Freedom Restoration Act
Q13: The Takings Clause is triggered by the
Q14: When the government restricts the exercise of
Q15: The states retain the exclusive power to
Q16: Government actions that are procedurally fair may
Q17: In the United States, state power is
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents