In Gross v. Diehl Specialties Intern., Inc., which of the following led to the final judgment made by the court?
A) The owner sold the company to the Diehl enterprises.
B) The company had declined severely in 1983 and 1984.
C) The plaintiff was terminated by the defendant.
D) The 1982 contract was not the operative contract because there existed no consideration for it.
E) The promise to carry out an already existing contractual duty does not constitute consideration.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q31: _ is an agreement where a defaulter
Q32: Which of the following considerations is legally
Q33: A promise to pay a debt discharged
Q34: An illusory contract lacks consideration because one
Q35: What is consideration? What are the purposes
Q37: A railroad company offers to purchase as
Q38: The mere promise to give consideration for
Q39: Excavators, Inc. ("EI") agreed to dig a
Q40: An apparently illusory promise may become enforceable
Q41: Essay Questions
Suggestion: Fifteen points total, five for
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents