Helen is the owner of a Japanese company that manufacturers car audio parts.Several months ago she received a favourable award in an arbitration in Japan against a Canadian car manufacturer for unpaid bills.The Canadian manufacturer has several assets in Canada,but none in Japan.Which of the following statements is true?
A) The award must be enforced in Japan,but since the Canadian manufacturer has no assets in Japan,it is highly unlikely that Helen will ever receive the award.
B) The award cannot be enforced since the dispute was settled by arbitration.
C) The award must be enforced in Japan,and since the Canadian manufacturer only has assets in Canada,it is highly unlikely that Japan will litigate further.
D) The award cannot be enforced in Canada since it took place in Japan.
E) The award can be enforced by a court anywhere in Canada.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q66: Discuss the advantages of arbitration in international
Q67: Which of the following provided rules to
Q68: An international court to litigate private disputes
Q69: Alternate dispute resolution generally consists of negotiation,mediation,and/or
Q70: Explain how Canadian businesses can become involved
Q72: E & J Mining will be involved
Q73: When comparing international contracts with domestic contracts,which
Q74: Canadian courts do not provide for the
Q75: Mandu lives in Toronto and would like
Q76: Mr.Smith and Sr.Zarza are negotiating an international
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents