O'Neil bought a new car from a Chevrolet dealer for family use.The contract he signed contained the following clause: "The parties hereto expressly agree that the dealer is not liable for any breach of condition or warranty,express or implied." He also bought a used car radio from the dealer for his old car,which he was keeping.The contract for the radio was not in writing.The car did not run properly; O'Neil had it back in the shop seven times in three weeks.It was finally determined that the problem was due to a faulty transmission.Unfortunately,the car radio didn't work either.On these facts,which of the following is true?
A) The contract for the radio is not covered by the Sale of Goods Act because the radio was not new.
B) The exemption clause in the contract for the car would succeed in defeating an action by O'Neil against the dealer for breach of contract.
C) The exemption clause does not apply to either because both involve fundamental breaches of contract.
D) The contract for the radio is not covered by the Sale of Goods Act because the contract was not in writing.
E) O'Neil has an action for breach of contract against the dealer,because the exemption clause does not defeat the dealer's obligation to deliver a properly performing car (fit for use) in a consumer transaction.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q44: Which of the following is true with
Q45: Quiet possession means that goods have to
Q46: Mrs.Quale bought a new sewing machine from
Q47: Gregory went to Collegiate Sports Ltd.with his
Q50: Edward goes to his neighbourhood hardware store
Q51: If goods are purchased by description or
Q53: John bought a used car for $5000.Shortly
Q54: Which of the following statements is correct
Q77: When the sale of goods is involved
Q101: Explain what is meant by merchantable quality.
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents