The plaintiff,M,quit her job because her then-employer,Mr.C,made unwelcome sexual advances and her career was not advanced as promised.Subsequently,Mr.C,on his own initiative,called her past employer,her present employer,and an instructor at vocational school and said that M was a thief,a false statement.As a result of that call,M lost her new job.Which of the following is true?
A) Mr.C's statement is defamatory by innuendo.
B) Mr.C could be sued successfully for defamation even though the defamatory words were not written down.
C) Technically,M could sue Mr.C for libel.
D) Mr.C could successfully use the defence of fair comment.
E) Mr.C could successfully use the defence of qualified privilege.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q58: A published true statement that injures the
Q59: A person can be sued for trespass
Q60: A person could be liable for the
Q63: The provincial government thought that the only
Q64: A 70-year-old woman,while using the escalator at
Q65: Explain when the defence of fair comment
Q66: Explain the defence of "reasonable communication" and
Q81: Define defamation.
Q128: Words that are basically innocent such as
Q132: Explain under what circumstances qualified privileges are
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents