Al bought a case of beer because his friends were coming over to watch the Grey Cup.During the game,Al opened a beer,poured about a third of it into Bob's glass,and handed the can to Chuck.Bob noticed the strange orange colour of the beer and called everyone's attention to it; unfortunately,Chuck had drunk most of the beer from the can before he heard Bob.There had been a small battery in the can that had contaminated the beer.Chuck was seriously injured.On these facts,which of the following is true?
A) Since Chuck did not buy the beer,he has no cause of action against anyone.
B) Bob could sue Al successfully for negligence,because Al poured the contaminated beer into Bob's glass.
C) Chuck could sue Al successfully for negligence,because Al handed the contaminated beer to Chuck.
D) Bob could successfully sue the manufacturer for negligence because he need only prove that the manufacturer owed him a duty of care and need not prove damages.
E) Because Chuck did not buy the beer,he could not sue the seller for breach of contract,but he could sue the beer manufacturer in tort.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q77: Explain in what circumstances the defence of
Q78: Joe is a publisher of a newspaper
Q79: Sam and John drank beer and watched
Q80: Which of the following does not describe
Q80: A reasonable person is one who is
Q82: Joe was driving his automobile when Sam
Q83: A duty is owed when:
A)it would be
Q84: In which of the following would the
Q86: The standard of care that is required
Q134: Distinguish between libel and slander.
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents