A state statute provides that a manufacturer has no duty to warn of "a material risk that should be obvious to a reasonably prudent product user." According to the majority in Greene v.A.P.Products,Ltd. ,a "material risk" is
A) a danger of physical harm,as opposed to mental harm.
B) a gamble that substantial performance will not satisfy a contract.
C) an important or significant exposure to the chance of injury or loss.
D) a risk of a major financial loss in the marketing of a product.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: In the facts of the previous questions,according
Q2: Pearl and Quincey agree to a contract
Q4: Under the statute in the previous question,VividAire,Inc.
Q5: GR8 Cereal Company contacts Harvest Distillers,Inc.(HDI),to buy
Q6: V-Power Corporation contacts Windstar,Inc. ,to buy wind
Q7: Harry and Ilsa agree to a contract
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents