In Circuit City Stores,Inc.v.Adams,the U.S.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that Circuit City's contract was
A) enforceable because it was a standard form contract.
B) enforceable because employees were required to arbitrate their dis?putes and the employer was free to litigate its claims in court.
C) unenforceable because the Federal Arbitration Act does not apply to such contracts.
D) unenforceable because it was unconscionable.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: In a brief filed in Gene's suit
Q1: The dissent argues that the regulation at
Q4: In Eastside Grocery Company's suit against Fresh
Q6: The majority concludes that the regulation at
Q7: Capital Credit Company files a suit against
Q7: In a brief filed in Lea's suit
Q8: In Vo v.City of Garden Grove,the significant,or
Q9: The United States Supreme Court has consistently
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents