In Sports Economics,production functions are often estimated by relating the winning percentage of teams (Y)to inputs indicating performance in certain aspects of the game.However,this omits the quality of management.Assume that you could measure the quality of pitching and hitting by a single index L,and that managerial ability is represented by M,which is assumed to be constant over time.The production function would then be specified as follows:
Yit = β0 +β1 Lit + β2Mi + uit
where i is an index for the baseball team,and t indexes time and all variables are in logs.
(a)Assume that managerial ability is unobservable but is positively related,in a linear way,to L.Explain why the OLS estimator 1 is inconsistent in the case of a single cross-section,i.e. ,if you attempt to estimate the above regression for a single year.Do you expect this coefficient to over- or under-estimate β1?
(b)If you had data for two years,indicate the transformation,which allows you to obtain a consistent estimator for β1.
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q22: HAC standard errors and clustered standard errors
Q28: A pattern in the coefficients of the
Q35: You first encountered growth regression in your
Q36: The main advantage of using panel data
Q39: Your textbook suggests an "entity-demeaned" procedure to
Q42: Consider the time and entity fixed effect
Q44: Your textbook modifies the four assumptions for
Q45: Consider the following panel data regression with
Q46: (Requires Matrix Algebra)Consider the time and entity
Q48: "Empirical studies of economic growth are flawed
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents