In Dansway International Transport Ltd. v. Lesway and Sons Ltd., the relevant contract did not state that time was important nor did it specify a time for performance. What did the Court find?
A) Because the parties did not include a provision as to time, the agreement was voidable at the option of either party, pursuant to the Sale of Goods Act.
B) Because the parties did not include a provision as to time, the agreement was void for a lack of the essential element of consensus.
C) Because the parties did not include a provision as to time, the Court could not invent one for them.
D) There was an implied term that performance had to be within a reasonable time, which would always be equal to one calendar month.
E) There was an implied term that performance had to be within a reasonable time, which would depend on the circumstances.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q51: In Hunter Engineering Co. v. Syncrude Canada
Q52: Vanderhoort contacted Prinz to buy a new
Q53: Which of the following is a statement
Q54: Mr. Olde died. Mrs. Olde was treated
Q55: The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act allows a
Q57: If the contract doesn't say who bears
Q58: Alf bought a car from Mr. Wojchu
Q59: Which of the following is false with
Q60: Which of the following is false with
Q80: The protection of consumers is solely a
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents