In Harvard College v. Canada (Commissioner of Patents) , Harvard College sought protection for a genetically altered mouse. What was the result given the decision of the Supreme Court of Canada?
A) The oncomouse was granted patent protection, on the basis that it was a non-naturally occurring composition of matter.
B) The oncomouse was granted patent protection, on the basis that it was not the product of the laws of nature.
C) The oncomouse was granted patent protection, on the basis that it was the product of inventiveness.
D) Unless the Patent Act is amended, higher life forms can only be patented under the doctrine of "sound prediction".
E) Unless the Patent Act is amended, higher life forms cannot be patented in Canada.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q77: Which of the following is true with
Q78: In Shun Cheong Holdings B.C. Ltd. v.
Q79: In Spycher Estate v. J.L. Coulter Ltd.,
Q80: There is an equitable principle that when
Q81: When a Court orders that any profits
Q83: Walt Disney Productions v. Triple Five Corp.
Q84: Homer Ford invented a unique pollution-free engine
Q85: Yung created a machine that was not
Q86: In order to obtain a remedy for
Q87: Cadbury Schweppes Inc. v. FBI Foods Ltd.
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents