In Peoples Department Stores Inc. et al. v. Wise et al., the Supreme Court of Canada had to clarify to whom a director owes its duties. What did the Court hold?
A) A fiduciary duty is owed to the company and to other stakeholders.
B) A duty of care is owed only to creditors, while a fiduciary duty can also be owed to other stakeholders.
C) A fiduciary duty is owed only to the company, while a duty of care can also be owed to other stakeholders.
D) A duty of care is owed only to the company, while a fiduciary duty can also be owed to other stakeholders.
E) A fiduciary duty is owed only to creditors, while a duty of care can also be owed to other stakeholders.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q43: Aunt Juliet wants to incorporate a small
Q44: Kent incorporated provincially. The corporation worked with
Q46: Mark wants to incorporate. Which one of
Q47: Which of the following is not an
Q49: Andrea agreed to form a corporation with
Q50: Punam was the director of a broadly
Q51: Consider the decision in Agrium Inc. v.
Q52: A securities commission is
A) an authorization to
Q53: Mr. Malik, an investment counsellor by training,
Q94: A corporation does not die but may
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents