Consider the Decision in Agrium Inc

Consider the decision in Agrium Inc. v. Hamilton. What did the Court find?

A) Hamilton's action did not constitute oppressive conduct.
B) Hamilton was liable for fraudulent misrepresentation.
C) Hamilton, as a director and majority shareholder of Flagstaff, was not in a fiduciary relationship with Agrium, a minority shareholder.
D) Hamilton was liable for insider trading.
E) Hamilton, as a director and majority shareholder of Flagstaff, was in a fiduciary relationship with Agrium, a minority shareholder.