Ravinder is the sole proprietor of a shoe store. He is also a partner in a restaurant, which has recently
Been sued for negligence after countless people got sick from the Salmon Alfredo dinner special. Which of
The following statements is true?
A) Because of the concept of limited liability, Ravinder can lose only what he has invested in the
Restaurant.
B) The successful plaintiffs in the restaurant action can only go after the assets of the shoe store if
Ravinder was the actual person who prepared Salmon Alfredo on the night in question.
C) Although the successful plaintiffs in the restaurant action can go after Ravinder's personal assets, they cannot go after the assets of the shoe store because the shoe store is a separate legal entity from
Ravinder.
D) The shoe store assets will only be available to the successful plaintiffs in the restaurant action if the
Shoe store is operated by Ravinder in conjunction with the restaurant.
E) If the plaintiffs win their lawsuit against the restaurant, they can look to the assets of the shoe store
To pay off the debt.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q43: Claire has been selling her famous cookies
Q44: In LeRuyet v. Stenner, Stenner defrauded LeRuyet,
Q45: The Court in Steinman v. Snarey found
Q46: Which one of the following statements is
Q47: In Ocean City Realty Ltd. v. A
Q49: Which of the following is the proper
Q50: Which one of the following situations will
Q51: Which of the following is correct with
Q52: Which of the following is correct with
Q53: Which of the following statements best describes
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents