In the case of Herff Jones Canada Inc. v. Todd, the Court considered a clause in a sales representative contract that prohibited the representative from working for a competitor for four years. What did the Court hold?
A) The covenant was unenforceable because it was not under seal.
B) The covenant was enforced because it was reasonable between the parties and reasonable with regard to the public interest.
C) The covenant was enforced despite been overly excessive, on the basis of the principle of the freedom to contract.
D) The covenant was unenforceable because such covenants demand independent legal advice prior to execution and none was obtained.
E) The covenant was void because such provisions are in restraint of trade and therefore automatically illegal.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q47: Which of the following statements more accurately
Q48: Which one of the following is correct
Q49: Mr. Lopez, the owner of the firm,
Q50: Lyons v. Multari was a case in
Q51: Which of the following is correct with
Q53: Federal and provincial human rights legislation cover
Q54: To avoid a complaint of gender discrimination,
Q55: (Modify this question for your province.) To
Q56: The process by which a particular union
Q57: With regard to employment law, which of
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents