On September 1, Beeton contracted to sell $4,000 worth of specified Kenyan lumber to Cairns. Beeton expected the arrival of the lumber soon, so the delivery date was set for September 8. On September 5, Beeton assigned, in writing, his contractual right to receive the $4,000 to his bank, which was pressing him to reduce his $17,000 debt. The bank sent a written notice to Cairns instructing him to forward the $4,000 to the bank and not to pay Beeton directly. Unknown to either Beeton or Cairns, the lumber had been lost at sea in August, before they had even entered the contract. On these facts, which of the following is true?
A) This assignment was not a statutory assignment; i.e., it failed to satisfy the statutory requirements for enforcement by the assignee against the debtor.
B) Because the goods bargained for had perished before the parties had contracted for them, the court would hold the contract void.
C) The assignee would receive whatever the assignor had assigned to him, namely, the $4,000.
D) Because the assignment was made by Beeton to his bank in good faith, Cairns must pay the bank $4,000.
E) The time for determining the "equities between the parties" is always the time that notice of the assignment is given.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q48: A real-estate agent, Jones, was owed a
Q49: A woman sought to set aside a
Q50: Privity of contract applies in which of
Q51: Mr. Copperfield, a collector of movie memorabilia,
Q52: Mr. Zink hired Bruce Dorne to create
Q54: With regard to the law governing privity
Q55: With regard to the law governing privity
Q56: The Weyburn Farmers' Co-op contracted to sell
Q57: Which of the following constitutes a misrepresentation
Q58: The law attempts to help persons who
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents