Misgana ran into Tarja at their local gym. Tarja, it turns out, operated an art gallery that did custom framing and mounting. Misgana had some beautiful prints she wanted to have put into special frames and agreed to pay Tarja $400 to have this done. Tarja passed the task along to her new assistant, Shandy. Shandy used the wrong adhesive when mounting the prints, which meant they did not stick properly to the backing. Which of the following is true?
A) If Tarja doesn't pay Shandy, Shandy could sue Misgana directly for her pay because she worked on Misgana's prints.
B) Misgana could only sue Tarja because she is the one who did a poor job of the framing.
C) Misgana could successfully sue only Shandy or Tarja for breach of contract, whichever she chooses, but not both.
D) Misgana could successfully sue Shandy and Tarja for breach of contract because both were connected with the job.
E) Misgana could successfully sue only Tarja for breach of contract.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q61: Mike is given a bottle of wine
Q62: Kassem was a real estate agent with
Q63: In AMJ Campbell v. Kord Products Inc.,
Q64: In 978011 Ontario Ltd. v. Cornell Engineering
Q65: With regard to the law governing privity
Q67: Al sells gravel to Bob on credit,
Q68: In the case Whighton v. Integrity Inspections
Q69: In Works v. Works, what was the
Q70: Lars Jepsen, a fisherman from Tofino, regularly
Q71: In Dansway International Transport Ltd. v. Lesway
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents