Mr. Buyer, the plaintiff in the action, was attempting to enforce a contract in which the defendant, Mr. Seller agreed to sell to buyer his property, Blackacre, for $100,000. Which of the following, by itself, would be sufficient to allow Mr. Seller to get out of the contract?
A) Mr. Buyer referred to essential terms in a letter sent to Mr. Seller.
B) There was only a verbal agreement between Mr. Seller and Mr. Buyer.
C) The $100,000 was not enough, not fair.
D) At the time of the contract, unknown to Mr. Buyer, Mr. Seller did not understand the quality and nature of this act because of mental incapacity.
E) Although both parties agreed to this, there had not actually been any money paid on the contract, not even a deposit or a down payment.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q10: Which one of the following is an
Q11: In jurisdictions other than British Columbia, which
Q12: Parents are responsible for their children's actions
Q13: Given the provisions of the Statute of
Q14: Which of the following contracts is void?
A)
Q16: Which one of the following correctly indicates
Q17: Which one of the following is an
Q18: When John bought a car from his
Q19: Which of the following is incorrect with
Q20: Requirements of a contract include capacity of
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents