In Royal Bank of Canada V

In Royal Bank of Canada v. Holoboff, the Bank sued Holoboff, a minor, who had sold his client card and personal identification number (PIN) to a third party who defrauded the bank. What was the result?

A) Holoboff was found liable for the tort of conspiracy to commit fraud.
B) Holoboff's parents were automatically liable for Holoboff's breach of contract.
C) Holoboff's parents were automatically liable for Holoboff's tort.
D) Holoboff was not liable for anything, as minors can never be liable.
E) Holoboff was found liable for breach of contract, despite being a minor.