A woman forged her husband's signature on dozens of cheques. In an attempt to protect her from prosecution, the husband signed a letter prepared by the Bank agreeing to assume all liability for the forged cheques. What would the Court find in relation to this agreement?
A) As an agreement to stifle a criminal prosecution, it was an illegal contract and therefore void.
B) The agreement was unenforceable because the Bank lacked capacity to enter into such an agreement.
C) Because the husband acted improperly, the agreement was voidable by the Bank on the basis of illegality.
D) While the Bank acted improperly, "freedom to contract" establishes that the agreement must be enforced.
E) The agreement was unenforceable because the husband was under duress at the time he signed it.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q61: When parents have led a merchant to
Q63: An adult can't sue an infant in
Q64: Whenever an adult enters into a contract
Q68: Contracts involving domestic relationships are presumed to
Q69: Which of the following types of contracts
Q74: Married women are no longer considered incapacitated
Q78: Because of the Charter of Rights and
Q80: Contracts that unduly restrict competition are void.
Q83: All contracts that have the effect of
Q99: Only contracts that involve the commission of
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents