You owe Mr. Store $900 for goods received and want him to take $800 in full satisfaction of the debt. Which of the following is false?
A) If he agrees with you and does take the $800, even if it is paid early at his request, he can still later sue you for the $100 forgiven. His promise not to demand the $100 from you was a gratuitous promise and therefore not binding.
B) If he actually takes the $800 in full satisfaction of the debt, statute law in many jurisdictions prohibits him from suing you for the $100.
C) If you pay the $800 before the actual due date in consideration for his taking this as full payment, he cannot sue for the other $100.
D) If Mr. Store agreed to take the $800 as full payment, but before taking it changed his mind, he would be entitled to the entire $900.
E) If Mr. Store agreed to take the $800 as full payment in exchange for your promise to sweep the floor of his store, he cannot sue for the $100.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q62: A contract is a single promise, made
Q68: In Gilbert Steel Ltd. v. University Construction
Q69: Anmool verbally agreed to build a deck
Q70: Sam owed Joe $6,000 due January 12,
Q72: Which of the following shows the use
Q74: In Bawitko Investments Ltd. v. Kernels Popcorn
Q75: Which of the following is correct with
Q77: Why is the case of Dickinson v.
Q78: Which of the following statements is correct
Q93: Only the person or group to whom
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents