An employee prepared an appraisal of a property for his real-estate development company. The employee had been told that the appraisal would be used by the company to attract a potential investor, Mr. Jones, for the company's client, Mr. Lee. Because the appraiser carelessly forgot to check the recent changes in the zoning by-laws, the appraisal was not accurate. Mr. Jones was misled about the value of the land and suffered a financial loss of $20,000. On these facts, which of the following is true?
A) If Jones sues the appraiser, he cannot also sue the employer company one or the other.
B) A person cannot be sued for words that cause loss, only for actions that cause physical injury.
C) The cause of action most likely to be taken by the investor is defamation.
D) Mr. Jones could not take any action because he had no contract with the company or the appraiser.
E) To win in an action against the appraiser, Jones must prove that the appraiser owed him a duty of care, fell below the standard of care owed and thereby caused him a foreseeable loss because of his reliance on the information.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q52: Jack works as a financial-planning consultant for
Q53: In Heitsman v. Canadian Premier Life Insurance
Q54: To have the schools valued for insurance
Q55: In which one of the following would
Q56: In Walton v. General Accident Insurance Co.
Q58: In Hodgkinson v. Simms, an accountant advised
Q59: Sumanthra, an accountant, prepared financial statements for
Q60: In which of the following cases is
Q62: Some jurisdictions have instituted "no fault" insurance
Q70: Strict liability means that liability can be
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents