When Mr. P dropped his wife off at work, the driver behind him, Mr. H, angered by the slight delay in traffic, approached Mr. P's car, called him names, and then punched Mr. P in the nose and mouth area with a closed fist. Mr. H was convicted and sentenced in criminal proceedings for his action. Given these facts, which of the following is true?
A) Mr. P could not take a civil action because a criminal action had taken place, and the same behaviour or action cannot be the subject matter of both types of proceedings.
B) Mr. P could also proceed in a civil action against Mr. H for the tort of nuisance.
C) Mr. P could also proceed in a civil action against Mr. H for the tort of battery.
D) Mr. P could ask for special damages, but not for general or punitive damages.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q2: Ms. Reed attended the zoning offices of
Q3: With regard to the law of tort,
Q4: Which of the following incidents describes the
Q5: When a court hears a breach of
Q6: Mrs. Kahn arranged a trip to Europe
Q8: Clark was at Computerheaven Ltd. and asked
Q9: Which of the following is an intentional
Q10: Read the following and indicate the true
Q11: Although nothing at all had been stolen,
Q12: Which of the following is false with
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents