In the Case of Bahner V

In the case of Bahner v. Marwest Hotel Co., the Court held that Mr. Bahner

A) had not been imprisoned at all.
B) had been imprisoned, but only in a lawful manner.
C) had been falsely imprisoned, but only by the restaurant security guard who detained him without authority.
D) had been falsely imprisoned twice, once at the restaurant security guard and once by the police.
E) had been falsely imprisoned, but only by the police who arrested him in the absence of a criminal act.