In Carley v. Willow Park Golf Course Ltd., what did the Court find?
A) The presence of a driving range constituted negligence, as driving ranges are unreasonable.
B) The presence of a driving range constituted a private nuisance, but there is no remedy for a mere nuisance at law.
C) The presence of a driving range could not be considered a nuisance, only a minor annoyance, for which there is no remedy.
D) The presence of a driving range could not be considered in the context of tort law, as the owners did not intend to cause harm.
E) The presence of a driving range constituted a private nuisance and issued an injunction prohibiting golf balls going onto their property.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q33: A person could be liable for the
Q34: Businesses that deal directly with the public,
Q35: Internet defamation is addressed in the case
Q36: Which of the following actions constitutes an
Q37: In the case of WeGo Kayaking Ltd.
Q39: Rob bet Joe $300 that the Chicago
Q40: Jim was assigned to a different workroom
Q41: Which of the following statements regarding privacy
Q42: According to the case of Ahmad v.
Q43: Which of the following is true in
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents