In Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc

In Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. v. Saskatchewan, the Supreme Court of Canada

A) concluded that the federal and provincial legislation were in conflict, with the result that paramountcy would apply.
B) held that only the federal legislation was invalid.
C) held that only the provincial legislation was invalid.
D) concluded that the federal and provincial legislation were not in conflict; one simply went further than the other.
E) held that both the federal and provincial legislation were invalid.