In CASE 24.1 Awad v.Ziriax (2012) ,Oklahoma passed the "Save Our State Amendment," which provided that Oklahoma courts could not consider international or Sharia law in making decisions.Awad,a Muslim,was the executive director of the state chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations and sued.How did the court rule and why?
A) The court dismissed Awad's lawsuit,holding that the First Amendment's Free Exercise clause does not apply to Muslims.
B) The court dismissed Awad's lawsuit,holding that he had no standing to challenge the law.
C) The court ruled for Awad,holding that the amendment violated Awad's First Amendment Right to Free Exercise of Religion.
D) The court ruled for Awad,holding that Awad's right to Due Process and Equal Protection was denied by the amendment.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q25: To encourage common banking standards and formulate
Q26: A _ eliminates internal trade barriers among
Q27: Choice-of-law provisions in a contract seek to
Q28: Some countries require employers to fund employee
Q29: _ tariffs require the importer to pay
Q31: Exports are controlled by means of export:
A)
Q32: Under GATT's principle of _ tariffs,each time
Q33: In a series of laws,known collectively as
Q34: Through the process of _,a nation that
Q35: The _ was created to provide financing
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents