In CASE 23.1 Tufankjian v.Rockland Trust Co.(2003) Tufankjian signed a contract to acquire a Toyota dealership for $1.4 million.Rockland agreed to lend Tufankjian $700,000 at 7.5% interest,with the remaining $700,000 to come from the SBA at a separate interest rate which was quoted by Rockland at 6.5% (but with no written guaranty) .Ultimately,the loan was not consummated and Tufankjian sued.How did the court rule?
A) The court dismissed Tufankjian's claims.
B) The court held Tufankjian breached his duty of good faith and fair dealing and awarded damages to Rockland.
C) The court held Rockland had committed fraud but only awarded Tufankjian nominal damages of $1.
D) The court held Rockland breached its duty of good faith and fair dealing and awarded damages to Tufankjian.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q22: _ a security interest involves making it
Q23: A _ interest rate fluctuates throughout the
Q24: Which of the following is NOT true
Q25: Which of the following is NOT true
Q26: An equipment lease that serves the purpose
Q28: An equipment lease that serves the purpose
Q29: While state restrictions may apply,there are no
Q30: Which of the following makes a security
Q31: Requirements that must be met under the
Q32: A(n)_ clause in a loan document provides
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents