In Pakootas v.Teck Cominco Metals,Inc.,plaintiffs sued the defendant Canadian corporation in a U.S.court,regarding an order under CERCLA pertaining to its contamination of water in Canada that reached the United States.Was the Canadian corporation subject to the courts of the United States?
A) The court ruled that the defendant lacked the minimum contacts necessary to require it to submit to the jurisdiction of a U.S.court.
B) The court ruled that subject matter jurisdiction did not exist.
C) The court ruled that the defendant was subject to jurisdiction in the U.S.court.
D) The court ruled that the defendant lacked the minimum contacts necessary to require it to submit to the jurisdiction of a U.S.court and that subject matter jurisdiction did not exist.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q21: Under the Clean Air Act,_ is/are primarily
Q22: When can a corporate officer be held
Q23: Under which of the following may a
Q24: Which of the following statements regarding the
Q25: The increase in the buildup of carbon
Q27: _ liability is the responsibility of an
Q28: The Paris Climate Agreement will take effect
Q29: _ concerns-that is,that decisions with environmental consequences
Q30: Which of the following authorizes the federal
Q31: Company X was responsible for 40 percent
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents