United States v.Jones involved a question of a GPS tracking device placed on a car that was tracked for over a month.The U.S.Supreme Court held that installing the device was:
A) a search incident to a lawful arrest,and did not require a search warrant.
B) analogous to a traffic stop in plain view,and therefore did not require a traffic stop.
C) "negligible" trespass on private property,which did not require a search warrant.
D) a trespass on private property,which required a search warrant.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q25: _ for arrest is defined as a
Q26: The defendant formally pleads guilty or not
Q27: Which of the following is NOT an
Q28: The Ex Post Facto Clause is violated
Q29: In Kyllo v.United States,the U.S.Supreme Court addressed
Q31: Which of the following is NOT true
Q32: A(n)_ is a court order based on
Q33: _ specify (specifies)actions that are U.S.federal criminal
Q34: Which of the following is true regarding
Q35: The number of U.S.federal criminal offenses is
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents