In the Holcomb v.Iona College case,a white assistant coach of a college basketball team alleged he was fired because he was married to an African American woman,and sued the college for violation of Title VII.How did the court rule?
A) The court ruled that Title VII was inapplicable to such claims.
B) The court ruled that Title VII was inapplicable because a private college,as opposed to a public college,was involved.
C) The court ruled that Title VII protects the parties involved in a racially mixed marriage,but that in other situations,such as dating relationships,Title VII would not apply.
D) The court ruled that Title VII protects employees from discrimination based on their association with a person of a different race.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q21: A reasonable accommodation for a disabled employee
Q22: In the International Union United Automobile,Aerospace &
Q23: Title VII prohibits discrimination based on:
A) race,color,and
Q24: CASE 13.2,EEOC v.Abercrombie & Fitch Stores,Inc.(2015)involved a
Q25: Which of the following is generally true
Q27: An employee may use the Family and
Q28: The Family and Medical Leave Act provides
Q29: Which of the following statements about an
Q30: What is the major provision of the
Q31: When an individual has experienced discrimination under
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents